Golden Compass The Movie

New Line Cinema’s latest contribution to the fantasy film genre is director/writer Chris Weitz’s (About a Boy) The Golden Compass, based on the 1995 award-winning book of the same title by Phillip Pullman. New Line was the studio behind director Peter Jackson’s interpretation of J. R. R. Tolkien’s fantasy trilogy The Lord of the Rings, and it may have another hit trilogy on its hands, beginning with The Golden Compass.

 

The Golden Compass is Book I of Pullman’s His Dark Materials trilogy; Part II is The Subtle Knife (1997) and Part III The Amber Spyglass (2000.)  Over 15 million copies of the books have been sold worldwide. As author Pullman notes, he has borrowed from every book he has ever read to create this best-selling and controversial trilogy and these include the fantasy writings and mythic imagination of C.S. Lewis and J.R.R. Tolkein. 

 

 

 

The Golden Compass is a very exciting film about a young girl, Lyra and her animal-shaped spirit companion, Pan, voiced by Freddie Highmore (called a daemon in the film) who guided by a golden compass embark on an odyssey to rescue their friends. It will engage young and old alike (scenes of peril and fantasy violence may scare very younger children.) There are missing children, interesting daemons (in Greek mythology, these are spirit beings who can be good or malevolent), terrible scientific experiments, great polar bears and witches, and the Authority, or Magisterium, that controls the universe.

 

The seamless animation and brilliant special effects should attract some awards. Dakota Blue Richards, not burdened by excessive cuteness, plays Lyra with strength and courage. Nicole Kidman is positively chilling as Mrs. Coulter. My favorite character is the great armored polar bear, Iorek Byrnison, voiced by Sir Ian McKellan. Along with Lee Scorsby,  an “aeronaut” from Texas, played by Sam Elliott, he is Lyra’s brave and loyal champion.

 The Controversy

Phillip Pullman (bn. 1946) is a professed atheist:  “Although I call myself an atheist I am a Church of England atheist, and a 1662 Book of Common Prayer atheist, because that’s the tradition I was brought up in and I cannot escape those early influences” (quoted in Killing the Imposter God: Phillip Pullman’s Spiritual Imagination in “His Dark Materials”, 2007, JosseyBass).

 

Some critics believe that Pullman’s fantasy epic is an expression of an atheist agenda. The Catholic League (www.CatholicLeague.org) agrees and has published a pamphlet about the book trilogy and sent it to all Catholic schools in the U.S. The Catholic League’s website states that seeing the film – even  if it is not as troubling as the trilogy – will cause children to want to read the novels and this would harm their faith. The Catholic League’s website says that Pullman has twin goals “to promote atheism anddenigrate Christianity. To kids.”

 

Others, such as Donna Frietas and Jason King, admit to Pullman’s atheism in their book Killing the Imposter God: Phillip Pullman’s Spiritual Imagination in “His Dark Materials” but think he employs feminist and liberation critical theology in his writings, and that using these lenses reveals truth rather than denies it. Kurt Bruner and Jim Ware concede Pullman’s darkness but also find and explore religious themes in their book, Shedding Light on His Dark Materials: Exploring Hidden Spiritual Themes in Philip Pullman’s Popular Series (2007, SaltRiver/Tyndale.)

 

His Dark Materials: Source Material

 

Phillip Pullman’s theological and spiritual source for the entire trilogy of fantasy books, His Dark Materials seems to be the epic scriptural/theological poem “Paradise Lost” by John Milton (1608 – 1674.) Milton’s influence on the Pullman’s worldview as revealed in His Dark Materials cannot be underestimated.

 

Milton wrote passionately against England’s monarchy as being head of church and state. In his later years, Milton also rejected Trinitarian Christianity and moved toward a more Unitarian theology. Some critics say that Pullman’s vision of Christianity is medieval but it is really the Christianity of Milton’s age, framed by the Renaissance-Reformation-and Counter-Reformation centuries that fuel his discourse.

 

Philosophically, Milton was a monist. Simply put, monists believe that all matter can be reduced to a single substance, a kind of energy that animates everything, even angels. Pullman calls this substance “dust”. 

 

Human free will is the key theme in “Paradise Lost” and His Dark Materials. Free will continues to be a point of theological debate between Catholics and Protestants and is contested in the film and books as well.

In the trilogy, Pullman places the headquarters of the church/magisterium (a term used by Catholics that means the teaching authority of the Church) in Geneva, Switzerland, where John Calvin’s (1509 – 1564) religious movement was based. It is interesting that Phillip Pullman does not single out the Catholic Church for his critique but includes all organized religion, including mainstream Protestant churches. There is one brief sequence when the polar bear Iorek Byrnison attacks the Magisterium’s building in the north to retrieve his armor; the building is adorned with icons. To me, this showed that religion was one of the agencies in the film oppressing the characters, not the whole story.

 

 Pullman’s Atheism?

There appears to be no explicit religious content, and therefore no explicit atheism in film version of The Golden Compass.  Also, one would be hard pressed to find philosophical arguments for atheism in the film.

 

The book version of The GoldenCompass is critical of religion and organized religion, though it is difficult to assess how much readers actually engage in the philosophy and theology that underpin his fantasy tale. Pullman does reject, and ultimately attempts to kill off, a convoluted idea of God in Part III of his trilogy The Amber Spyglass. On the one hand he presents a theological image of God as an old man, perhaps cruel and distant. On the other hand, Pullman rids the universe of a philosophical image of God that is uninterested in his creation, a creation that originally created him in the first place.

 

To believers, God is the author of creation and not subject to it; therefore, the god that Pullman tries to kill through the imposter angel Metatron in The Amber Skyglass, is not the God we believe in anyway. 

 

Pullman’s image of God reminds me of how Bruce described him in Tom Shadyac’s 2003 film Bruce Almighty: “God is a mean kid sitting on an anthill with a magnifying glass, and I’m the ant. He could fix my life in five minutes if He wanted to, but he’d rather burn off my feelers and watch me squirm.” Although it is not clear if the divine will be part of any subsequent films, should they be produced, perhaps Pullman has done us all a favor by ridding us of many false images of God.

 

I do think that Pullman’s writings ultimately reveal a nihilistic view of life and at the end of the day, shed little light on the meaning of life.  The Golden Compass film, however, demonstrates the values and virtues heroism, self-sacrifice and courage that transcend the challenges the characters face. If future filmsare made, we can hope that they will be consistent with this first film.

 

Tags:

1 Comment

  1. Very good analysis, Sister Rose. Very helpful to parents. I have defended the Catholic League in their stand because I appreciate their watchdog role in a society that is rife with unacknowledged anti-Catholicism. Still, I have not believed that their approach is appropriate for dealing with His Dark Materials and The Golden Compass as works of art. I think your media literacy tack is a good and measured approach to viewing and reading Pullman’s works.

    When I was a girl, I paid close attention to the Legion of Decency's movie ratings system. I still remember the uproar when the mainstream Hollywood film "Kiss Me, Stupid", starring Dean Martin & Kim Novak, was rated "C" or Condemned by the Legion of Decency. Most of the time "C" was reserved for foreign films; the racier Hollywood fare usually received a "B" rating, which I believe was "Morally Objectionable in Part for All" as opposed to "C", "Morally Objectionable in Total for All".

    I was very curious to see "Kiss Me, Stupid",  far more curious than I was to see any of the movies on the "B" list.  What could be so bad that a Dean Martin movie wound up with the "dirty" foreign films like "I am Curious, Yellow"?

    I did not go to see it, but I still remember that great curiousity to see the forbidden film. My own children are now all grown. But I have a nine year old granddaughter who might want to see The Golden Compass. She is just finishing the last Harry Potter book also, and is already looking for her next fantasy series to read. So I feel I am well-armed with the approach to take with her, if The Golden Compass comes onto her radar as a film or a book. Thank you.

    Rae Stabosz


Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s